The behavior of hashCode() and equals() methods

Sometimes, you need to compare objects of your custom class with each other. The java.lang.Object class, which is the superclass of any class, provides two methods for that: equals(Object obj) and hashCode(). Their default behavior is the following:

  • boolean equals(Object obj) checks whether this object and another one are stored in the same memory address;
  • int hashCode() returns an integer hash code that is unique for each object (object’s identity).

Let’s look at how they behave. Here’s a simple Person class with three fields:

class Person {

    private String firstName;
    private String lastName;
    private int age;

    // constructor, getters and setters

There are two objects that basically represent the same person (i.e., the objects are logically equivalent):

Person p1 = new Person("John", "Smith", 31);
Person p2 = new Person("John", "Smith", 31);

However, the equals method considers them to be different since it compares references rather than the values of their fields:

System.out.println(p1.equals(p2)); // false

The hashCode method also says nothing about their equality:

System.out.println(p1.hashCode()); // 242131142
System.out.println(p2.hashCode()); // 1782113663

Note, you may see other values than 242131142 and 1782113663!

So, the default behavior of methods equals(Object obj) and hashCode() is not enough to compare objects of a custom class by the values of their fields.

What’s interesting is how these methods behave with standard classes, for example, String :

String person1 = new String("John Smith");
String person2 = new String("John Smith");

System.out.println(person1.equals(person2)); // true

System.out.println(person1.hashCode()); // 2314539
System.out.println(person2.hashCode()); // 2314539

If we want to define a similar logic for equality testing in the Person class, we should override both of the described methods. It is not enough to just override just one of them.

Overriding equals()

To test the logical equality of objects, we should override the equals method of our class. It is not as trivial as it may sound.

There are some math restrictions placed on the behavior of equals, which are listed in the documentation for Object.

  • Reflexivity: for any non-null reference value x, x.equals(x) should return true.
  • Symmetry: for any non-null reference values x and y, x.equals(y) should return true if and only if y.equals(x) returns true.
  • Transitivity: for any non-null reference values x, y, and z, if x.equals(y) returns true and y.equals(z) returns true, then x.equals(z) should return true.
  • Consistency: for any non-null reference values x and y, multiple invocations of x.equals(y) consistently return true or consistently return false, provided that no information used in equals comparisons on the objects is modified.
  • Non-nullity: for any non-null reference value x, x.equals(null) should return false.

To create a method that satisfies the listed restrictions, first, you need to select the field that you want to compare. Then you should perform three tests inside the equals method:

  1. if this and other object have the same reference, the objects are equal, otherwise — go to step 2;
  2. if the other object is nullor has an unsuitable type, the objects are not equal, otherwise — go to step 3;
  3. if all selected fields are equal, the objects are equal, otherwise, they are not equal.

If you do not perform all of these tests, in some cases, the equals method will not work properly.

Here is a modified class Person that overrides the equals method. It uses all three fields in comparison.

class Person {

    private String firstName;
    private String lastName;
    private int age;

    // constructor, getters and setters

    public boolean equals(Object other) {
        /* Check this and other refer to the same object */
        if (this == other) {
            return true;

        /* Check other is Person and not null */
        if (!(other instanceof Person)) {
            return false;

        Person person = (Person) other;

        /* Compare all required fields */
        return age == person.age &&
                Objects.equals(firstName, person.firstName) &&
                Objects.equals(lastName, person.lastName);

In the example above, we use java.util.Objects.equals(obj1, obj2) to check if the string fields are equal. This approach allows us to avoid a NullPointerException.

Below is an example where we test three objects for equality. Two of the objects represent the same person.

Person p1 = new Person("John", "Smith", 31); // a person
Person p2 = new Person("John", "Smith", 31); // the same person
Person p3 = new Person("Marry", "Smith", 30); // another person

System.out.println(p1.equals(p2)); // true
System.out.println(p2.equals(p3)); // false
System.out.println(p3.equals(p3)); // true (reflexivity)

As you can see, now the equals method compares two objects and returns true if their fields are equal, otherwise — false.

Overriding hashCode()

If you override equals, a good practice is to override hashCode() as well. Otherwise, your class cannot be used correctly in any collection that applies a hashing mechanism (such as HashMap, HashSet or HashTable).

Below are three requirements for the hashCode() method (taken from the documentation).

1) Whenever it is invoked on the same object more than once during an execution of a Java application, the hashCode method must consistently return the same integer, provided no information used in equals comparisons on the object is modified. This integer doesn’t have to remain the same from one execution of an application to another.

person1.hashCode(); // 400000 - ok
person1.hashCode(); // 400000 - ok
person1.hashCode(); // 500000 - not ok

2) If two objects are equal according to the equals(Object) method, then calling the hashCode method on each of the two objects must produce the same integer result.

person1.equals(person2); // true
person1.hashCode() == person2.hashCode(); // false - not ok, it must be true

3) It is not required for unequal objects to produce distinct hash codes. However, the programmer should be aware that producing distinct integer results for unequal objects may improve the performance of hash tables.

person1.equals(person3); // falseperson1.hashCode() == person3.hashCode(); // true - will work

The simplest implementation of the hashCode() method may look as follows:

public int hashCode() {    return 42;}

It always returns the same value and satisfies both required conditions 1 and 2, but does not satisfy the optional condition 3. Unfortunately, this method is very inefficient for industrial programming since it totally degrades the power of hash-based collections. A good hash function tends to generate different hash codes for unequal objects.

To develop a valid and effective hashCode method, we recommend the algorithm proposed by Joshua Bloch in his book “Effective Java”.

  1. Create a int result and assign a non-zero value (i.e. 17).
  2. For every field f tested in the equals() method, calculate a hash code code:
    1. Calculate the integer hash code for f :
      • If the field f is a boolean: calculate (f ? 0 : 1);
      • If the field f is a byte, char, short or int: calculate (int) f;
      • If the field f is a long: calculate (int)(f ^ (f >>> 32));
      • If the field f is a float: calculate Float.floatToIntBits(f);
      • If the field f is a double: calculate Double.doubleToLongBits(f) and handle the return value like every long value;
      • If the field f is an object: use the result of the hashCode() method or 0 if f == null;
      • If the field f is an array: see every field as a separate element and calculate the hash value in a recursive fashion and combine the values as described next.
    2. Combine the hash value code with result as follows: result = 31 * result + code;.
  3. Return result as a hash code of the object.

It is important, do NOT include fields that are not used in equals to this algorithm.

Here we apply the described algorithm to the Person class.

class Person {

    private String firstName;
    private String lastName;
    private int age;

    // constructor, getters and setters

    // overridden equals method

    public int hashCode() {
        int result = 17;
        result = 31 * result + (firstName == null ? 0 : firstName.hashCode());
        result = 31 * result + (lastName == null ? 0 : lastName.hashCode());
        result = 31 * result + age;
        return result;

Below you can see an example of invoking hashCode() for three objects. Two of the objects represent the same person.

Person p1 = new Person("John", "Smith", 31);  // a person
Person p2 = new Person("John", "Smith", 31);  // the same person
Person p3 = new Person("Marry", "Smith", 30); // another person

System.out.println(p1.hashCode()); // 409937238
System.out.println(p2.hashCode()); // 409937238
System.out.println(p3.hashCode()); // 689793455

As you can see, we have the same hash code for equal objects. Note, since Java 7, we have an java.util.Objects.hash(Object... values) utility method for hashing Objects.hash(firstName, secondName, age). It hides all magic constants and null-checks inside.


The default behavior of the equals method provided by the java.lang.Object class checks whether objects references are equal. This is not enough if you would like to compare objects by the values of their fields. In this case, you should override the equals method in your class.

The correct implementation should satisfy the following conditions: reflexivity, symmetry, transitivity, consistency, and non-nullity. You should also override the hashCode method, taking into account that:

  • if two objects are equal, they MUST also have the same hash code;
  • if two objects have the same hash code, they do NOT have to be equal too.

While it is good to understand hashCode() and equals() methods, we do not recommend to implement them manually in industrial programming. Modern IDEs such as IntelliJ IDEA or Eclipse can generate correct implementations for both these methods automatically. This approach will help you to avoid bugs since overriding these methods is quite error-prone.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.